Theresa Might, Beth Ford, The View : Broadsheet for Might 24

Of ladies and wonks. As we reported earlier this week, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand is the newest Democratic 2020 hopeful to launch a significant coverage proposal—her “Household Invoice of Rights,” introduced Wednesday, would put money into maternal and youngster well being, adoption and in vitro fertilization, paid household depart, and common pre-k. However she’s not alone in specializing in insurance policies that may have a large affect on ladies. In truth, she’s wasn’t even the one presidential candidate to take action this week—simply days earlier, Sen. Kamala Harris introduced a proposal aimed toward closing the pay hole.

As you’ve probably observed, current editions of the Broadsheet have been filled with coverage proposals from the ladies working for the Democratic nomination—notably Gillibrand, Harris, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, all of whom have been cranking out detailed plans at a formidable fee. What’s extra, a good variety of them are tackling points which might be notably related to ladies, together with pay equality, paid depart, childcare, and reproductive well being.

So, how in regards to the male candidates? Whereas most of the Democratic males do contact on these points on their marketing campaign web sites, I believe it’s honest to say that they haven’t but given them the identical degree of consideration. (This Vox explainer on the the place the varied Dems stand on “household points” speaks volumes.)

Maybe it’s not shocking that feminine candidates could be out in entrance with fleshed out insurance policies regarding ladies. However that doesn’t imply it’s not important. Think about how far more progress we’d have made on these points if extra ladies had run for president—and put such issues entrance and heart—previously.

And what ought to we make of the truth that the feminine candidates appear to be placing forth so many coverage plans of every kind at this stage of the race? One factor I hear from feminine executives is the arrogance they discover in being ready—in some instances even over-prepared. And definitely the stereotype of ladies is that we do our homework, whereas males usually tend to really feel safe winging it. Is that what’s at play? Or maybe it’s the suspicion feminine candidate has a more durable time passing the ‘would I’ve a beer with him/her?’ commonplace that some voters apply to presidential races. Should you can’t skate by on “likability,” wowing them along with your concepts is admittedly the one possibility.

Related posts

Leave a Comment